My colleague Thomas provided me with a brilliant link to a piece discussing the measurement of social capital. At first I was a bit skeptic because the author - who are the authors by the way? Who are behind gnudung.com? - keeps stressing the search for hard data to measure in the growing body of social capital theory. I was thinking to myself that maybe you’re asking the wrong questions if you persist on looking for hard data to answer your questions. Maybe you shouldn’t look for the amount of social capital, maybe you ought to look at the meaning of social capital…the meaning of trust, the meaning of reciprocity - what does those factors mean for a social network for instance over time? Later on I started to get down right disillusioned as the piece kept going on about quantitative methods and the hardship of measuring social capital quantitatively.
Well I know it’s all a matter of your perspective on scientific method, and my initial skepticism when reading the piece quickly vanished as I was once again soothed and reminded that Ideally, measures of social capital should be thouroughly based on, and tied to, the conceptual framework for the specific study. Basicly that means that the questions you ask has to guide your choice of method. I couldn’t agree more. Thanks, Thomas for the reference.
2 comments so far
I really enjoy this site. Iwish I could come here everyday\all day. Please do keep on putting up much more info!
All stirred up and nowhere to go | Wexploration I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my problem. You are incredible! Thanks! your article about All stirred up and nowhere to go | Wexploration Best Regards Craig Schaad